Activity of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for biodiversity conservation

Authors

  • S. Suresh Ramanan Kerala Agricultural University KAU, College of Forestry, P.O Vellanikkara, Thrissur, 680656 Kerala, India
  • Anatoliy A, Khapugin Joint Directorate of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park "Smolny", Republic of Mordovia, 430011 Saransk, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24917/25438832.2.13

Keywords:

biodiversity monitoring, ecological assessment, ecological policy, nature conservation, funding

Abstract

W artykule przedstawiono zwięzłe sprawozdanie dotyczące chronologii oraz działalności Międzyrządowej Platformy Polityki Naukowej w sprawie Różnorodności Biologicznej i Usług Ekosystemowych (IPBES). Organizacja ta przywiązuje szczególną wagę do globalnego stanu różnorodności biologicznej, trendów i aktywności politycznej. Artykuł prezentuje uogólniony obraz rozwoju i osiągnięć IPBES w trakcie jego istnienia. Raporty IPBES ze względu na swoje znaczenie są uznawane i aprobowane na całym świecie. Jednak rozpoznawalny sukces IPBES jest niweczony przez sytuację finansową IPBES. W efekcie istnieje stan, która prowadzi ostatecznie do wniosku, że zawsze następuje hamowanie finansowania wspólnego dobra.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Barbault, R., Le Duc, J.P. (2005). Proceedings of the International Conference "Biodiversity: Science and Governance". Paris: Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle.

Burch, S., Berry, P., Sanders, M. (2014). Embedding climate change adaptation in biodiversity conservation: A case study of England. Environmental Science & Policy, 37, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.014

Dean, W.R.J., Milton, S.J. (2000). Directed dispersal of Opuntia species in the Karoo, South Africa: are crows the responsible agents? Journal of Arid Environments, 45(4), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.2000.0652

Editorial (2016). Private funding for science. Nature Methods, 13, 537. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3923

Fateryga, V.V., Bagrikova, N.A. (2017). Invasion of Opuntia humifusa and O. phaeacantha (Cactaceae) into plant communities of the Karadag Nature Reserve. Nature Conservation Research, 2(4), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2017.011

Hilton, G.M., Cuthbert, R.J. (2010). The catastrophic impact of invasive mammalian predators on birds of the UK Overseas Territories: a review and synthesis. Ibis, 152(3), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2010.01031.x

Howarth, C., Viner, D., Dessai, S., Rapley, C., Jones, A. (2017). Enhancing the contribution and role of practitioner knowledge in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Working Group (WG) II process: Insights from UK workshops. Climate Services, 5, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2017.04.003

IPBES (2016). The methodological assessment report on scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services. In: S. Ferrier, K.N. Ninan, P. Leadley, R. Alkemade, L.A. Acosta, H.R. Akçakaya, L. Brotons, W.W.L. Cheung, V. Christensen, K.A. Harhash, J. Kabubo-Mariara, C. Lundquist, M. Obersteiner, H.M. Pereira, G. Peterson, R. Pichs-Madruga, N. Ravindranath, C. Rondinini, B.A. Wintle (eds.), Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn: IPBES.

Johnson, C.N., Balmford, A., Brook, B.W., Buettel, J.C., Galetti, M., Guangchun, L., Wilmshurst, J.M. (2017). Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene. Science, 356(6335), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9317

Larigauderie, A., Mooney, H.A. (2010). The Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for biodiversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.006

Larigauderie, A., Watson, R.T. (2017). IPBES calls for peer review of its draft assessments. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 1(6), 164. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0164

Liebhold, A.M., Yamanaka, T., Roques, A., Augustin, S., Chown, S.L., Brockerhoff, E.G., Pyšek, P. (2016). Global compositional variation among native and non-native regional insect assemblages emphasizes the importance of pathways. Biological Invasions, 18(4), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1079-4

Loreau, M., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Arroyo, M.T.K., Babin, D., Barbault, R., Donoghue, M., Gadgil, M., Häuser, C., Heip, C., Larigauderie, A., Ma, K. (2006). Diversity without representation. Nature, 442(7100), 245–246. https://doi.org/10.1038/442245a

Pei, L., Gaisser, S., Schmidt, M. (2012). Synthetic biology in the view of European public funding organisations. Public Understanding of Science, 21(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510393624

Potts, S.G., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V., Ngo, H.T., Aizen, M.A., Biesmeijer, J.C., Breeze, T.D., Dicks, L.V., Garibaldi, L.A., Hill, R., Settele, J., Vanbergen, A.J. (2016). Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being. Nature, 540(7632), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20588

Reis, H.T., Collins, W.A., Berscheid, E. (2000). The relationship context of human behaviour and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 844–872.

Rybakova, L.I. (2013). State Scientific and Technological Policy and Financing of Science (Experience 2000–2012). Science. Innovation. Education, 14, 151–174. [In Russian]

Sharma, G.P., Raghubanshi, A.S., Singh, J.S. (2005). Lantana invasion: an overview. Weed Biology and Management, 5(4), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-6664.2005.00178.x

Smith, J.B., Schneider, S.H., Oppenheimer, M., Yohe, G.W., Hare, W., Mastrandrea, M.D., Patwardhan, A., Burton, I., Corfee-Morlot, J., Magadza, C.H., Füssel, H.M. (2009). Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) "reasons for concern". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(11), 4133–4137. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812355106

Stokstad, E. (2017). UN biodiversity group confronts cash crunch. Science, 355(6332), 1358. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.355.6332.1358

Turnhout, E., Bloomfield, B., Hulme, M., Vogel, J., Wynne, B. (2012). Conservation policy: listen to the voices of experience. Nature, 488(7412), 454–455. https://doi.org/10.1038/488454a

van Kleunen, M, Dawson, W., Essl, F., Pergl, J., Winter, M., Weber, E., Kreft, H., Weigelt, P., Kartesz, J., Nishino, M., Antonova, L.A. (2015). Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature, 525(7567), 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14910

Vavilov, N.I. (1927). Geographical regularities in the distribution of the genes of cultivated plants. Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Selection, 17(3), 411–428.

Villamagna, A.M., Murphy, B.R. (2010). Ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): a review. Freshwater biology, 55(2), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02294.x

Viña, A., McConnell, W.J., Yang, H., Xu, Z., Liu, J. (2016). Effects of conservation policy on China’s forest recovery. Science Advances, 2(3), 1–8. p.e1500965. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500965

Downloads

Published

2017-12-31

How to Cite

Ramanan, S. S. ., & Khapugin, A. A. (2017). Activity of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for biodiversity conservation. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Naturae, 2(1), 170–175. https://doi.org/10.24917/25438832.2.13

Issue

Section

Various